A “mysterious disease” recently struck the southwestern corner of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). Between 67 and 143 people over two weeks. The disease was said to cause flu-like symptoms of fever, headache, cough and anemia.
An epidemiologist said Reuters That it was mainly women and youngsters who were severely affected by the disease. But still little or no is thought about this disease.
Health officials within the DRC are urgently investigating the incident to find out the reason for the deadly outbreak. Initially, they are going to consider possible diseases which are endemic to the region reminiscent of Malaria, Dengue or Chikungunya.
However, it may possibly be difficult to seek out their cause. Problems with diagnostic testing infrastructureAs well as difficulties in collecting samples, getting these samples to the laboratory and testing them.
In low-income countries, reminiscent of the DRC, many clinical laboratories can only test for common pathogens. I limits Quality and performance Some of their medical laboratories even have an issue.
If it's not one among the standard suspects, detecting rare pathogens often requires sending samples to more specialized laboratories that may perform specialized tests, reminiscent of gene sequencing.
This may mean that samples have to be sent to laboratories abroad. However, there’s international sharing of such biological patterns. Highly controversial over concerns that the advantages of doing so are sometimes not equitably shared between countries;
Another priority for local health officials is to grasp the magnitude and severity of the outbreak. The high death toll and variety of infected people is alarming. However, it is just not easy to work out the precise extent of such an outbreak, as not all infected patients can be detected.
Not all victims seek care. Clinics will be few and much between, especially in distant areas, and are sometimes understaffed. Indeed, the DRC has. Less than two doctors per 10,000 population (in comparison with the UK where there are over 31 doctors per 10,000 population).
Global Press/Almy Stock Photo
Even if patients go to a hospital or clinic, not all infections can be diagnosed. Not all patients can be tested for infection, and never all detected infections are reported to health authorities.
Lack of data in regards to the cause, extent and number of individuals affected makes it difficult to accurately estimate the chance. But this is just not an isolated threat. There are outbreaks of latest infectious diseases. Happened regularly over the years.
This is driven partly by climate change, population change, urbanization and deforestation, which have led to changes from animals to humans. Enables “spillover” of infection.
Unfortunately, our global pandemic radar is broken. Disease surveillance is globally fragmented..
In poor countries there can be many areas where diseases go undetected or are detected late. Monitoring services are sometimes available. Poor resources And understaffed, staff often lack training or supervision, and reporting is probably not standardized.
There can be a major delay between the time an individual becomes infected and is diagnosed. Public health authorities were notified.. This leads to a delay in response to epidemic control. These problems are worse in resource-poor settings, reminiscent of in sub-Saharan Africa.
What are you trying to unravel?
A World Health Organization (WHO) initiative is being piloted in several countries in Africa, South America and South Asia. 7-1-7 initiative. It sets aspirational targets for infectious disease outbreaks to be detected inside seven days, public health authorities notified inside in the future, and 7 days to finish an initial response. It's a laudable goal, but it surely could also be too late for a fast-spreading outbreak.
Another solution is to raised coordinate and coordinate existing monitoring activities and systems. One such initiative is WHO. Integrated disease surveillance and response (IDSR), which has been deployed primarily in Africa over the past 20 years.
IDSR has had mixed success to this point. Oh A recent review Information technology system issues, financial constraints and data sharing issues in addition to manpower gaps were identified.
Other global initiatives include International Pathogen Surveillance Network Collected by the WHO Hub for Pandemic and Epidemic Intelligence, and up to date efforts to advertise Collaborative supervision To work together and share information in addition to expertise across different agencies and sectors (from human health to animal health and the environment).
The effectiveness of such measures stays to be seen, but they’re a step in the proper direction. Without higher global disease surveillance, we may not detect the following pandemic until it is just too late.