Climate change is a threat to production and food security worldwide, with plant diseases being one in all the predominant threats. An international team of researchers around Professor Santhold Essing of the Technical University of Munich (TUM) has now shown that the further spread of the fungal disease wheat blast could reduce global wheat production by 13% by 2050. May be. The result’s dramatic for global food security. .
With a world area of ​​222 million hectares and a crop yield of 779 million tonnes, wheat is an important food crop. Like all plant species, it’s fighting diseases which might be spreading more rapidly than a number of years ago resulting from climate change. One of them is wheat explosion. In hot and humid regions, the fungus “” has change into a serious threat to wheat production because it was first observed in 1985. It initially spread from Brazil to neighboring countries. The first cases outside of South America were in Bangladesh in 2016 and in Zambia in 2018. Researchers from Germany, Mexico, Bangladesh, the US and Brazil have now for the primary time modeled how wheat blasts will spread in the longer term.
Regionally, as much as 75% of the overall wheat area was affected.
According to the researchers, South America, South Africa and Asia will probably be the regions most affected by the spread of this disease in the longer term. 75% of the realm under wheat cultivation in Africa and South America could also be threatened in the longer term. According to forecasts, the wheat explosion will proceed to spread to countries previously only barely affected, including Argentina, Zambia and Bangladesh. The fungus can be entering countries that were previously untouched. These include Uruguay, Central America, Southeast America, East Africa, India and Eastern Australia. According to the model, the danger is low in Europe and East Asia – aside from hot and humid areas in Italy, southern France, Spain and southeast China. Conversely, where climate change results in drier conditions with temperatures greater than 35°C, the danger of wheat blast may additionally decrease. However, in these cases, heat stress reduces yield potential.
Dramatic yield losses require adaptive management.
Affected areas are among the many areas most affected by the direct consequences of climate change. Food insecurity is already a serious challenge in these areas and the demand for wheat, especially in urban areas, continues to rise. In many regions, farmers could have to modify to stronger crops to avoid crop failure and financial loss. In the Brazilian Midwest, for instance, wheat is being replaced by corn. Another necessary strategy against future yield losses is the breeding of resistant varieties of wheat. CIMMYT, in collaboration with National Agricultural Research Systems (NARs) partners, has released several wheat blast-resistant varieties which were shown to assist mitigate the results of wheat blast. With correct sowing date, conditions promoting wheat blast through the earing stage could be avoided. Combined with other initiatives, this has proven successful. In more specific terms, this implies avoiding early sowing in central Brazil and late sowing in Bangladesh.
A primary study on yield losses resulting from wheat blast
Previous studies on yield changes resulting from climate change have mainly considered the direct effects of climate change reminiscent of rising temperatures, changes in rainfall patterns and increased CO2 emissions into the atmosphere. Studies of fungal diseases have up to now ignored wheat blast. For their study, the researchers focused on the effect of wheat blast on yield by combining a simulation model with a newly developed wheat blast model for wheat growth and yield. Environmental conditions reminiscent of weather are factored into the calculation, as are plant growth data. Thus, scientists are modeling disease pressure in a very sensitive stage because the ear matures. This study focused on the results of wheat blast on yield. Other consequences of climate change may further reduce yields.
Leave a Reply