Health advice that forestalls you from getting sick can really hurt you while you already get sick. This contradictory medical reality is a brand new name: “Condo's contradictions”After analyzing the outcomes of several studies, the UC San Diego School of Medicine was developed by Professor Rafael Koomo.
Paradox describes how behavior is taken into account unhealthy – lifting extra weight, drinking moderate quantities, raising cholesterol – sometimes related to higher survival in individuals who have already got cancer or heart disease. This is a trend that challenges all one -sized approach to medical advice.
This doesn’t mean that the window prevention guidelines are thrown. Rather, it shows that nutrition must be considered a stage -related medicine. Before diagnosis, the goal is obvious: reduce your risk of getting sick. After diagnosis, priorities dramatically change strength protection, strict treatment and avoiding dangerous complications.
This distinction could be very vital for tens of millions of individuals affected by modern cancer or heart disease. Often, doctors' prevention advice is applied-reduce the dose, eliminate alcohol, eliminate cholesterol levels-patients who’re immediately avoiding war chemotherapy or managing weakness. These competitive goals can completely discuss with different dietary strategies.
Instead of copying the guidance of coomo prevention, there may be a private dietary argument after being diagnosed. The 40 -year -old disease -free thing doesn’t help to get a 70 -year -old cancer patient through treatment.
The pattern is just not completely latest. Researchers have long done documents Obesity Paradox In the care of cardiovascular and cancer, where heavy patients sometimes survive for a very long time after illness. These observations have given rise to a few years of debate, critics have indicated on the time of measurement, the disease, unintentionally weight reduction and statistics prices that may explain these results.
Although the design of a careful study may reduce some contradictory signals, they don’t at all times disappear. The contribution of the coomo is connecting these steadily -run vomiting with many aspects, resembling weight, alcohol, cholesterol – and multiple diseases, which have created a united framework. Stage -related nutrition.
The results don’t negate science. Obesity And alcohol clearly Increase The risk of cancer and heart health deteriorates. But once the disease is eliminated, survival equations change, and strict prevention goals will not be in accordance with the treatment of every patient.
Practically contradictory
Why can extra weight help with cancer survival? The answer is within the brutal reality of cancer treatment. Chemotherapy, radiation and surgery are physically punishing, breaking muscle and tissue. Patients with maximum deposits – each fat and vital, muscle mass – these attacks will be higher to make weather higher and resist rapid weight reduction that indicates healthy.
When an individual was last weighed in matters. A one who is now underweight – on the time of diagnosis – could also be obese before he gets sick, but there may be a better risk of death than an individual with obese for the aforementioned reasons.
Similar patterns appear with alcohol. Although drinking increases the chance of cancer clearly in proportion Consumption and durationSome studies recommend a calmly moderate alcohol drinker show Better Or Parallel The results of the diagnosis in comparison with non -drainers. Interpretation is hazardous – light alcohol will be treated as different social or health, while some can leave alcohol because of illness, comparing it.
Ports/Shutter Stock.com
Cholesterol offers one other puzzle. In advanced heart disease, very low cholesterol sometimes indicates wider health problems: inflammation, nutrition and liver disorders. In these cases, Low cholesterol Instead of leading direct consequences, it’s more more likely to reflect the underlying disease, which suggests that sick patients often exhibit low levels. These Creates a sized sample of U Where an excessive amount of and little or no cholesterol are related to the increasing risk of death.
Komo's message is just not that “high cholesterol is good” but aggressive prevention goals in weak patients may not have the option to enhance survival and to take care of strength and quality of life. Treatment decisions require individuality and careful monitoring.
This means to doctors, this implies to separate the prevention from the goals of survival. Before diagnosis, standard guidance is applied: maintain healthy weight, limit alcohol, manage cholesterol. After diagnosis, targets should reflect the disease phase, treatment plans, physical formation and other health conditions. Focus on avoiding weight reduction while maintaining muscle and energy during energetic treatment.
Coomo's Paradox doesn’t upset health advice. It emphasizes the context. The behavior that avoids the disease is just not at all times those that support the very best of survival after the occurrence of a serious illness. This unhealthy habits will not be allowed – it’s demanding individual care that balances survival, strength and quality of life through careful medical supervision.